This is the ARCHIVED ART CATALOGUES.
For the newest paintings, please go to:
https://www.avenuege.com/ArtCatalogue
In May 2017, in an Avenuege event at lovely localities at
Handverkeren in Oslo, the first "Avenuege library" book
was published, entitled, "The Beauty of Ballerinas--
awakening non-artificial intelligence". At roughly
samte time, it was listed at the databases of the National
Libraries of Norway.
The book is foundational for the entire spectre
of Yoga4d Avenuege activities, what with its
physics and all that. More than a dozen paintings were on
display and cool music played in the background. The book
will regularly be reprinted and complements books also
associated with our Intraplates activities.
Art as Permanent Imprint of Fuzzy, Real Harmony
Art as Inspiration for Excellence in Dance
Art as the Thought-Form of Your Upcoming Success
Art as the Hard Work of Not Imitating
Art as Ballerinas Beyond Gravitation
Art as First-Hand Expansion of Your House
Art as Bringing Together People to Think Freely
..the impressionism of our times is not about self-pity,
but going beyond self; and the pain of discipline
behind the effortlessness of the ballet dance movement
exhibits something of the muse-like quality we need,
in our times. Impressionism in early 20th century
was first rather patch-like, eg reflections in water,
but now it is any painting-style between cartoon and photo,
in which a sense of energy impression is conveyed. --S.R. Weber
Yes, they are ballet dancers, doing some form of
contemporary or classical ballet dance with exquisite
technique and majestic beauty, or they may be training,
or preparing, or resting/meditating; but the surroundings
may be as much as in space, with energy bands flashing
through, as it can be indoors--and the dancers, of
course, are our muses
A ballerina with ballet slippers over her shoulder by S.R.Weber, 50x50 cm
Click on it to enlarge.
To view or buy paintings, contact srw @ avenuege dot com
Norwegian price in year 2018 is at NOK 10.000 kroner.
As you know, paintings appear different every day, depending on
such as with angles and tones of the light and with your perspective;
please remember that when viewing photos of paintings!
Newest paintings: scroll to the completion of this page, and a
little up. These dance or muse oriented contemporary
impressionism paintings in acrylic are suitable also to
stimulate creative work and harmony, both in private and
public spaces, both office and home living environments. You see
that the price is actually quite close what's typical of graphical
print produced in series of hundreds; here, the energy of each
painting is, of course, coming forth more strongly in that
there is only one of each ("OOE", as we sometimes call it).
Earlier paintings and background are also shown on this page. More
of the newest, from this year, in the section nearer the bottom
of the page.
On a distant planet (or maybe Earth),
the Three Graces (or Muses)
greet the Sun (or dance one of their
muse-acts to change a world)
Muse impressionism, signed SRW
PAINTINGS BY S R WEBER
The melting of philosophy, a relaxed, openminded
spirituality and art {for clarification of the
concept of "muses" see also a footnote on this
page}. Half a meter in width & height.
Three muses. In all art history, from the time when such as the
classical greek sculptures were made, and then so revered, and imitated
by the Roman empire, throughout the baroque and gradually more and more
modern periods--and with parallel developments, more or less, in India
and other parts of the world, artists have explored the notion of angelic
muses or supreme beings--often three of them at a time--as sources of
luck and happiness, wealth, fortune and good health for those who find
themselves within their sphere of influence when they are benevolent.
Since the oracles at Delphi, Olympia and elsewhere conveyed messages
to the leaders of states and armies by the means of the nymphetic
priestly sylphs--humans imitating some aspect of the higher muses,
and with the more modern concepts presented in various newer developments
since then (also in theology), the young woman, sometimes etherically
slim and, as for the greek gods or muse-beings, often with a gracefully
athletic build, long legs defying gravitation by powers greater than
those ruling over mortals, has persisted to be a symbol of wholeness,
whether divine or nearer to gold and mammon. What you see above is some
of the ripe forms of acrylic 'impressionistic' (or 'muse
impressionistic') feeling and sense of such sentiments (in addition
there are variations including face portraits etc, scroll below). This
explores the exciting middle-ground, so to speak, between the anatomy as
can be shown on a photography, and the sketchiness that leaves much room
open for imagination; it involves a nudity that is not imposing;
and with a landscape that COULD be a beach, or a landscape, but also
could be kind of free, auric, energetic space, or a different level
of existence, or the inside of an exotic building with a magnificent
display. Though perhaps it is as if an auric photograph from a place
somewhere behind and up, on a small hill behind a beach, gazing on
the grace of the relaxed muse or muses; they, in turn, are perhaps
taking in the immensity of the energy of the Sun, and the play of
reflections on the waves, or buildings, or whatever is in front of
them--shielded, sometimes, by a rockwall of sorts, or by standing
sufficiently behind the beach proper, letting the horizon line be
seen in the distance above them; and other variations that play on
the fundamental forces of Nature--air, or space, light, as the Sun
or stars or the fire of awakening, rocks, as stone or a hint of
mountains, water, as ocean or sea, and the living force of the feel
of beautiful human skin, hinted at, and as such more real, for the
living human mind, than when attempted to be imitated.
This, then, is how we build upon the past of
art history to put forth the coherent definition of
what we call muse impressionism
(or, if you like, contemporary impressionism,
or contemporary muse impressionism).
Acrylic 50 centimeter x 50 centimeter: Muse touring a scifi city
The human mind is magnificent when given a chance. Paintings of
this sort, with a rich, harmoniously crafted texture, indeed do
the mind, your mind a good chance, of shuffling through alternative
views of the patterns, and thereby of stimulating to new harmonies and
intuitions each day in yourself and in those around you. This, then,
is a 21st century evolved form of what perhaps can be called
'impressionism'--in the sense that it is neither abstract nor
photo-imitating figurative, but a particularly tuned in-betweenness
that computer graphics cannot fully approach on itself.
Those who are lucky enough to have such paintings in their daily life
and work environments, living-rooms, offices, sleeping rooms, hallways,
training rooms, and so on and so forth, will find new freedoms in
the spaces that these open in the mind. The paintings have hints
of various forms of wholeness and gestalts that can inspire to
melodious, musical ideas; of course the word 'music' comes from the
same root as 'amusement', namely, again: muse, the muses, the three
muses, and so this is a musical, or muse impressionism.
Acrylic 1/2m x 1/2m: Girls talking, city muse impressionism
These forms were evolved, in what we can term relaxed colors,
after an extensive period of contact of Stein Henning W Reusch Braaten,
whose artist name is Stein R Weber, with the famous Norwegian painter
Frans Widerberg (see intro-text below, or scroll at once to the section
near completion of this long page to see more samples in the style above).
For one thing, Widerberg emphasized, more than most productive Norwegian
painters in the 20th century, a certain type of elegant sketchiness
that is suggestive of an evolved type of impressionism. Another thing
that Widerberg brought forth is the esthetical validity of allowing the
'beings of space' have legs that often may be thought of as a kind
of radiant energy, sometimes permittinga length and a thinness that
have a particular beauty due to the geometric proportions possible in
such imagined spaces, without the restrictions that gravitation imposes
on natural bones. This can be--as SRW has done--be looked into further
also by means of various forms of order and golden ratios, including,
of course, also the the Fibonacci series of numbers, cfr the G15 PMN
programming page by SRW a series of comments about orders of harmony and
indeed also an algorithm 'Fibo' that shows how to easily make these
numbers in his own programming language.
Three additional sources of influences should be mentioned at once,
for completeness: the contact with the mountaineer and deep ecologist,
the philosopher Arne Naess, over quite some time; earlier on, some
contact with the physicist David Bohm, and his view of the universe as
what he, in his explorations of the concept of 'wholeness' termed 'the
implicate order'--Bohm evolved this some decades after his meetings
with Albert Einstein, meetings that led directly to Bohm developing
what has become regarded as an important alternative interpretation of
quantum phenomena--and, thirdly, and perhaps fourthly, dance and
photography, also connected to art photos of dancers, and to the wider
range of photography where one can touch on that which is called 'the
tantric' (a blending of meditation and sensuality) {there's more
information on these influences further on in this page, also through
links here}.
As preparation for this ripe style, much work has been put into finding
the color tones that reflect both vividness and harmony; both energy and
tranquility; and that are compatible with a variety of life situations
without being too imposing. These are all about half a meter times half
a meter, acrylic paintings made on solid classic canvases and sold for
a stable price (updated only for inflation). The price is set by the painter
according to the intensity of work associated, on the average with each
painting. The canvases have a high-quality handcrafted feel. From the first
to the last of how these artworks come about, there's no sense of any
second-hand or mass-produced about these, and each painting unfolds on its
own premises rather than being a duplicate derived from a single sketch or
from some form of computer graphics. This contributes to ensuring that the
feel of the artist and the esthetical insights of the same are present in
a first-hand sense in each. The Avenuege stores, made by the same, are,
in addition to atelier sales, a stable environment for providing new
SRW paintings. These have an economy in that when resold, later, eg
by art sellers and galleries, there will be a reference from it in this
catalogue and the original price level will be known thereby. The
interested reader may want to know that these activities by Stein Weber
complements, among a range of other activities including writing,
more technical activities and other design activities of the same
as eg at shown at intraplates.com/learningpmn.htm. This is a new and
original type of programming language made by same (programmer's name is
an alias of SRW, Aristo Tacoma), which is fully complete, and has another
aspect [that's still in development], which is a new type of PC hardware.
The interaction with the entirely 'analog' nature of the paintings and
the orientation towards beauty and anatomy is particularly harmonious
when blended with exact 'hardcore' work of this sort. For any company that
seeks a blending of creativity and harmony, of logic and intuition, of
orientation both toward the technical and towards the esthetical, this
scope of activities may suggest that these muse-impressionistic paintings,
signed SRW, are just the right type to hang up around in a company setting,
too; and to be replaced for additional stimulation after a season or two
with newer ones by same.
AVE NU EGE /// ArtCatalogue
S R Weber
Muse Impressionism /// in Space
How did this style emerge? What phases, what other colors and
shapes and forms have been experimented with? This page is the
permanent ArtCatalogue at Avenuege.com, and it lists ALL the
paintings by Stein R Weber from 2014 and onwards.
Impressions of muselike girls
conveyed in elegant acryllic
with a style of spontaniety
Canvas of size about 50cm x 50cm
(about 19.5 inches x 19.5 inches)
and: it's only one of each painting
Consult if you like the 'Dialogue' about how
this style of painting emerged. Remember that
the paintings speak much more vividly when seen
in both full real size and with the sparkles
of real light playing upon the paint
For the newest painting series, pls move ahead
on this page several screenfuls. The present
year is listed there.
AVENUEGE STORES:::ART SECTION:::STEIN R WEBER PAINTINGS
After next article is a DIALOGUE (at a fairly early stage
in the development of these artworks). Lines are drawn back to
SRW's friend and first strong influence, Frans Widerberg.
Widerberg died in April 2017. For those who are not
very familiar with Widerberg, next is, before the DIALOGUE,
a faximile and translated excerpts of a newspaper article
about Widerberg written right after his death.
Excerpts, translated, from one of the articles (they were
in every Norwegian newspaper) about the Norwegian
painter Frans Widerberg, after his death in April 2017.
The excerpts are from an article by Øivind Storm Bjerke,
{cfr faximilie}, art journalist, and the article is
copyright him and Klassekampen--for the whole article and
for any further use of this text and/or the faximile as
shown next cfr the website of the newspaper
(www.klassekampen.no).
TRANSLATED EXCERPTS:
<<[...] Frans Widerberg [...] was one of the most
significant characters in newer Norwegian art history
[...]. His name is associated with long, slender beings
perhaps with big feet planted solidly on Earth, striving
high up towards a blue heaven, or they may be on a
free-floating journey in between planets and galaxies. He
illustrated the life journey of the human being with
powerful brush strokes of mostly blue and yellow colors.
"The art of Widerberg enlives, confronts and
challenges the aware attentiveness of the senses with
its powerful images and the raw if not brutal brush
language.
"Widerberg had a natural authority through his great
skills, the originality in his art, and his charismatic
personality. As a young man he got instruction in the
foundational techniques by his relation, Birger Moss
Johnsen, painter and criticist. Then he studied at
Kunst og Handverksskolen, Studieatelieret in Bergen, as
well as the Academy of Art in Oslo. He learned much from
the danish graphic artist Povl Christensen and the
painter Aleksander Schultz. They gave him a solid,
classical academic foundation suitable for further work.
[...]
Widerberg belonged to the group of artists who explores
the existential and spiritual dimensions of existence.
His language was rich in symbols and metaphors, both
verbally and in terms of his images. In his art
Widerberg is a friend in spirit of the mystic Willian Blake
(1757-1827) and our own visionary romanticist Lars
Hertervig (1830-1903). [...] As in a harmonic composition
is every little detail part of the great whole.
But Widerberg was also a modernist. His art cannot be
understood without strong impulses from Edvard Munch's
later art. [...]
Frans Widerberg belonged to the happy few artists who,
early on, was embraced by criticists, museums and the
public. [...]
[He] was one of the artists who represented Norway most
often in international contexts in the period from 1970 to
2000. [...] The large exhibition in Oslo in 1996 at Astrup
Fernley Museum of Contemporary Art was a peak point in his
career, an abundant generosity of art. [...]>>
(Translation by SRW)
A DIALOGUE WITH S.R.W.
:::A dialogue
A: SRW, let me read to you this letter written by G Brandes
after a stay at an atelier in Berlin with artists including
young Norwegian Chr. Krogh:
<<..And there [in Berlin, in 1878], I came to know
a small group of young artists. They lived, or gathered,
at an atelier in the tower of a fifth hall in the nice
Hohenzollernstrasse. The house was at a corner with a
wide and beautiful view of the Schoeneberg Ufer, but
the view was the best part of their place. One and
the same room had to serve both as art studio and sleeping
room. All over the walls there were studies (conducted
under the guidance of Gussow) but also many original
attempts. They were -- naturally -- enthusiastic nihilists,
socialists, atheists, naturalists, materialists and
egoists. They begun the day by preaching to each other
what would be the most unsettling concepts for anyone
in the slightest concerned with social harmony [..]
They condemned anyone who could admit to being led by
anyone else, who could be led by anything but the most
shameless self-love. They nurtured vehement disgust --
hate is much too weak a word -- for the whole of
mainstream art [..] (except for Menzel, Boeklin and
Gussov). They had seen through life. There was nothing to
work for and nothing worth hoping for. It was about,
as painlessly as possible, to kill time; they were too
old to have passions; too blase to run after illusions,
too knowing of art to admit themselves of being geniuses,
too proud to care about flatter or reputation. It was
about making the day pass as well as any other -- to paint
a little, shuffle cards in some good play, and have good
and very long sleeps. In a word, they were young, young!
in the beginning of their twenties, consumed with pleasure
seeking, overly ambitious, fanatically enthusiastic
about art, whiteglowing in their rage against hypocrisy [..]
and so eager about preaching the gospel of selfishness that
they lived in total communism, helped one another, starved
for one another, and loved one another.>>
This is from Oscar Thue's book Christian Krogh, Oslo,
1997.
SRW: Yes? It's a lovely description, of course. Probably
quite correct in many ways as well, don't you think?
A: Yes.. but how does it fit with your attitude to art?
SRW: I think I have a totally different take on it. And yet,
-- there's an honesty in the description which I find somewhat
irresistible. The paradoxes. How they are wanting to be
egoists but somewhat trapped in a state of mutual love because
they share their little philosophy; unwantonly, they become
communists. I love it! And yet, of course, I don't think
they have grasped -- if the description is right -- a few
things which are essential in art.
A: No? Such as?
SRW: Take the thing about 'egoism', or 'egotism', however
we phrase it. And this about 'gospel of selfishness'. It's
a guess this is coming from much the same type of rebellion
against church authorities which also drove the poet Nietzsche
on. However there's more anger than wisdom in much of what
Nietzsche came up with, I think.
A: How?
SRW: Well, at least in his publications at a later time
than this, I think it's right to say that he goes too far.
I mean, society and its quasi-religions is one thing, and
cosmos, God is wholly another. One thing is to be enraged by
the double standards of priests, their hypocrisy and so on.
Another thing -- entirely different -- is to assert that
this universe is but powder, particles, stardust, rather
insignificant stardust at that, bits and pieces which do
not communicate. All that type of worldview is highly
improbable if you take a relaxed view of -- well, a lot
of the science in the century which came after that visit
by Brandes to Berlin. And in my intuition as well!
A: You believe in an interconnected universe?
SRW: Well, of course. That phrase may be as good as any
other. But the key thing is that there isn't a 'natural'
philosophy in beginning with cause and effect and sharp
division between ego and other and all that. This also
goes into the question of sexuality, the communion not
only in thought but in emotion, and in ways which all
who goes meditatively, deeply into sex with a partner or
partners would get to know. You can't simply divide the
universe up that way. Egoism may be felt as a strong
emotion, intense, but it doesn't make it free from
illusions.
A: But surely there are many people in this world who
would say that egoism, or selfishness, -- if they are
honest about their opinions -- is pretty much how things
are being run.
SRW: Well it may look that way. I'm not too sure.
A: No?
SRW: The egoist will want to see the mind as a machine.
I don't.
A: It isn't a machine?
SRW: The trouble is rather, if you believe you're a machine,
you'll make yourself and your emotional reactions fit that
pattern more and more, and it will seem to confirm itself.
You have to be more scientific about life -- drop the
illusion of self, and see what happens.
A: Now I take it that if you do this, you'll come up with
art such as yours -- just to connect this dialogue with
art?
SRW: Possibly. This universe may be just one of many, but
all linked together organically and springing from one
source -- not as a mechanical process, nor with any
foundation in randomness, and this we may call the
multiverse. At SOME level, -- and this I believe is
scientifically correct to say -- there's room for a different
type of beings, with highly refined structure. Now let us
imagine that this Deep Space, if you like, is inhabited by
the most wonderful human, or human-like, girls; they roam
these spaces, defying gravity, doing things of key importance
for all. I call them muses, though the ancient Greeks would
have called many of them gods, and I see them all as girls
though it is also correct to say that they are transgender!
These I feel as real, -- they live in a sort of orgasmic
space. The paintings reflect their more adult form, and in
situations which could provide calmness and focus for
us when we the paintings are up on the wall -- so there's a
selection of situations, not every one of them, but suitable
for any kind of daily life practise or business mode when
we have them in our rooms and houses and working places.
A: You say the muses are real?
SRW: Yes. Of course, it may all be a sweet illusion, and I
make no assumption that you have to believe in anything to
appreciate this as art. In any case, I don't think it's all
an illusion. These are my sketches of what I think I see.
But one can take them as a way to stretch our perceptive
organs into new forms of space and healthy, glowing
good interconnectedness, of a kind which is also soothing
psychologically -- you don't have to adopt a philosophy to
look at them. Frans Widerberg, who really started the
whole process of painting muse-like energetic beings
floating in space way more than anyone else in the 20th
century that I know of, agreed with me that the quest of
the painting is to go beyond thought, beyond theory,
beyond the imitation of reality. In that way it may
reflect a movement, -- whether we assert that we "know"
what it is all about, or not. Most likely, we'd be better
off by not asserting that we know. During our hundreds of
hours of dialogue over art -- including what came forth
in the dialogic introduction I once wrote to his
exhibition, his Aurum exhibition at Gallery K, Oslo
around year 2000 -- he greatly emphasized the validity of
not knowing; and inevitably, with a humorous twinkle in
the eyes -- showing something of the paradox of 'knowing
that one doesn't know'.
A: Are your paintings in his tradition, then?
SRW: Maybe not. I think Widerberg's paintings are beyond
any tradition and will remain so. Some might try and put
art history in terms of trends, and fold painters into
these trends. There are, however, always those who can
only be studied on their own, for their own, and similiar
in literature, science, etc. For instance, Michael Ende
in literature, the dutch M C Escher as for drawings and
prints, Gustav Klimt, or in music Bach, and his teacher
in improvisation, Boehm, -- these are grander than any
tradition. Widerberg, clearly, worked from an inspiration
which wasn't codified as a part of some theory of art.
In any case, certainly I had no idea that I wanted to do
anything that would look like his works when I begun my
own self-teaching as to anatomy, sketching -- with pen,
and on computer, etc -- and also painting; after a great
deal of variation, and pushing it aside and doing other
things, eventually I came to realize the dance of the
beauty of some of the color scheme and the emphasis on
free space that also Widerberg always emphasised, and
still does. And then all our conversations and my many
hours in his atelier began coming alive to my mind,
and teach me things I didn't know I had picked up. I
wouldn't try to impose myself on any tradition. What I
paint stands on its own, and I never look to anything
anybody else does in going from one painting to the next.
There may be something I'm doing that hasn't exactly been
done before, either -- can you see that?
A: Yes, I think I can.
SRW: Something with dance, maybe. To me, dance is as
much a mantra as any other normal word I know of. I
wish the merest glimpse of one of my paintings will
come lead to some more dance, or greater humour, the
twinkle in the eye, or the fresh motion of mind. To me,
dance is also the meditative, sensual, even sexual
presence without an ego where there is silence in the
mind, of something beyond, something which unites.
A: And the role of green? Does the focus you have when
you work with computers on the harmonious effects on
green come forth when you work with a similar color
in paint?
SRW: Yes, that's a big theme, if I can explain. So,
to begin with, I have a passion for the role of the
brightest, most optimistic, most passionate signal
spring green, the type that a computer monitor can
vividly show and which interacts very peculiarly, and
harmoniously, with the human retina.
A: Does this connect to the afterglow effect?
SRW: Yes. The aftereffect of computer green -- or as
you say it, afterglow, or the shadow, we could say, of
a green lamp, is rather pink. In a way, world gets pinkier
when we learn to harness computer green. That's greatly
complicated in terms of painting, as also Kandinsky
pointed out; and perhaps, by learning from Widerberg
but blending with that passion I have, I am getting the
paintings to have the impressionistic esthetical power
and feeling that they must have to be objects of art.
The approach to an almost translucent blue-green with
touches of yellow and sometimes red or dark-red against
a widebergian dark or light energetic space-like
landscape seems to me perhaps to be the way forward,
as it has the tranquility I think paintings should
have when they're up on the wall and have to blend in
a little bit with all sorts of other things and
activities. When chemical paint, the green gets by
necessity different than on the computer monitor,
and the dark-green becomes, in my paintings, rather
the blueish background. This is all an exploration
process at present, and as you can see, I begun this
ripe phase by going strongly for red and so on and
the approach towards a new understanding of the role
of green came in some sense by itself, without an
effort, while exploring what sense I wanted the
paintings to have. The color scheme is one thing --
but the sense of the muse beings as real in a stellar
type of deep space is unwavering. By the way, when I
say "impressionistic" I think of the intent -- not the
form, but the intent that I think I read in what Vincent
van Gogh did -- the radiance of his complex raw roughness,
relationship to energy -- but with more shapely lean
dancing-like female beauty as a token of eternity than
in what I have seen in art history. (Though of course
the concept 'impressionism' is by some sought to be
distinguished from, or be sub-categorised into, a number
of branches including 'post-impressionism', and entirely
different terms like 'expressionism', even when one may
argue that they are all varieties of impressionism, in
the much broader sense we intend here; however, while
'expressionism' may seem to be a neat concept, it is
perhaps more selfish in that instead of sketching so as
to convey an impression of a beautiful woman, it is
rather the ego expressing itself, magically or not.)
A: Your country-man Edward Munch was one of those who
the elder Krogh sort of publically supported. Munch were
rawer and cruder in his brushstrokes and to some, at the
time of Munch in Oslo, it seemed that Munch's paintings
were 'unfinished'. But Krogh said that when a painter
feels that his or her paintings are done, then they are
done, and that's that. Is there something to learn from
all this?
SRW: As I see it, Munch expresses much of the same
sentiment as those gathering together with the young
Krogh as in the text by Brandes that you translated and
read up in the beginning of our dialogue. But he does so
in a way which speaks more of the reality of soul and
of the importance of what the art does to the mind and
heart of the person, rather than to what extent it
imitates photographically what is seen. So Munch was one
of the pioneers in wrenching the paintings out of the grip
of an imitative attitude. In this, he technically pointed
out some ways which have been much elaborated on since
his time, by many. But to me, it was too much self-therapy
in what he did; to me, art has to shake us out of the
hypnosis that only matter is real, and rather lift
the depth of our spirits into some form of effervescence.
Or as Spinoza would put it, hilaritas.
A: Back to the question of color scheme, if that's the
phrase I want. When I look at the beginning of the
catalogue, I find that a translucent green is but also
very light bluishness is getting dominant. But there is
a sometimes very lively texture of the painting.
SRW: Well, that's it. The girl or girls, and the texture,
these two in a way should be one whole; I don't know if
you know that Munch sometimes put his paintings on the
floor so visitors to his atelier had to walk over them.
Widerberg sometimes also did just that. I have much more
to say for that approach than the notion of building up
a 'perfect' form, step by step, by a conscious, thought-
controlled process, full of habit, routine, technique,
deliberation and the inevitable boredom that follows
such a procedure. I am not that kind of painter at all.
Rather, in a way, there has to be a war on the canvas,
and the shape or shapes have to be emergent, in a way;
and this is something I think you can recognise in by far
most of the great works of art in art history: coherence,
or wholeness, arises as something not quite thought-
controlled. It is said that Manet used sometimes to scrape
of the day's work when it didn't get a certain wholeness;
then he would look for what suggests itself and emphasize
that, and emphasize more than out there in real reality,
cutting out middle-tones, and staying deliberately within
a certain type of shall we say pixel resolution.
So what came out of all the work with, as you say,
cadium-like color tones of the green and yellow type,
seemed to be that I want to more or less hide it it
behind a bluish or light-bluish texture -- to me, the
color of the orgasmic space within which the muses live.
I seek to convey the fun, beauty and elegance of drawing
such as by pen but in the powerful format of a painting:
instead of fill in the shape with one type or other of
color, and becoming full of the imitation attitude
relative to photography, it is perhaps the sublime
shape, hinted at, emerging which is important in any
technologised society, for photography handles a lot of
things which may be psychologically important to all
human beings and paintings can then be given a more,
I don't know, higher role. Does this make sense?
A: I think so. Are you saying that when the texture
is good enough, the painter more hints at what suggests
itself?
SRW: Well, surely there is something like that in mostly
all creative processes, right? Not just painting. But
the texture has to be right-right. The whole 'war on
the canvas' between a vast number of vague yet in their
own sense perhaps somewhat fascinating suggestions must
fit with what is then drawn, and if it doesn't, one must
do it all over again, perhaps again and again. In some
cases, I've been battling over a single painting so long
that it has surely got so much paint on it that its
weight has increased, at least by a measurable number
of grams. What I find is that the work with some kind
of blend of colors where bluishness can dominate but
the computer green inspiration has done its work, so
to speak, on the painter, and in the background of
the canvas, its underlaying layers, can then give the
possibility for a more suggestive type of painting
to work all the way, without it looking nor being
drawings at all. It is its own thing, and it also
has, perhaps, a certain meditative feeling of dance
that the more strong characters one may like to
paint and emphasize perhaps do not give equally. I
am at ease with the whole range of explorations, but
most, of course, with what has emerged this way, and
so this is the way forward, as I see it. I also find
that the face portraits--here the girls, the muses,
are often a bit younger--, in the same vaguely
impressionistic style on blue, is conveying the
appropriate harmonious energy; and I'm glad to see
that this is, as I perceive it, also the view that
others are taking.
Let me add, as a completing comment to this little
introductory dialogue of ours, that I believe that
Goethe got it right when he spoke of colors as
something that can arise by the angles and contrasts
and movements of sharp contrasts--even just of black
and white. And so what I seek in terms of colors,
including the computer green, can or may be or are
going to be more and more realized without using any
such color as substance. It is a question of an
intent to stimulate, not to simulate; to stay near
the sketch, not the filled-out form, --all these
things and more is implied in what we've been talking
about.
A: It will be interesting to see what comes up!
SRW: I hope so!
*****
[[[All intro-texts at this site from 2014 and 2015;
acknowledgements to dancer and choreographer Monica
Emilie Herstad for pointing out the word 'effervescence';
the sequence of the paintings in the catalogue tell
their own story of the quests mentioned herein.]]]
Muse-Impressionism: how SRW defines it, as of the startup
of this always ongoing painting series {year 2014 & 2015}:
<<A painting in the 21st century, it appears to me,
must defy all laws of photography and yet manage
to achieve that which photography always strives for.
The very possibilities, that whispered beauty,
must be forcefully realised; and in spite of the painter, also.
They must have an otherworldly beyond-gravitation beauty
more or less impossible to concretely achieve in reality.
Humans compare each other by photographs; but a painting
of a muse-being is beyond comparison; the muse is there to
lift up, not to be compared with. We can pride ourselves
with the anatomical exactness with which we can replicate eg
the impression of a foot, but the muse knows what she
wants to convey, and has no patience with our
desires to demonstrate our technical skills.
Even so, we can obviously find shadows of the muses
in mere manifest human beings, and paint with inspiration
and enjoyment whether from live models or photos;
though at some stage the painting process must leap
beyond the explicate universe, shamelessly.
<<It is perhaps pretentious, but it is quite clear to me
that if a painting doesn't want to be painted, it shouldn't
be painted. Effortlessness is the door to make of the
action that of the feeling that one is a camera, however
what is 'photographed' here is not the manifest reality,
but something stronger, and more real, and more sublime
than manifest reality. The muses are real: the painter
is at best a lens, getting out of the way so that they
can show what they want to show. As the poet "must get
off the page" -- J.D. Salinger said that -- the painter
must 'get off the painting'. There's no choice in it.
and the lack of choice is the fairly masoschistic fun
of the muse-impressionistic painting process.
<<What is the effect of the painting on the
observer? How, at best, is it to have them in a room
one is having work-time or leisure-time in? One gazes
not into them, but out into the multiverse through them;
they enlarge the room, but without coolness; and the
observer will feel that playful awareness flows in them.
Yet there are elements, aspects of the elegant that
keep on enthralling as they should, around in the
paintings; and they don't have ego-emotions. They have
a sense of nothingness, of the kind that blesses you.>>
-- Stein Reusch Weber
An early atelier for Stein R Weber
Blue, yellow, and red,
are the elementary colors.
/// J W von Goethe
Yepp, and computer green
/// S R W
The notes about the importance of seeing the paintings in real
life and not merely watch a computer photo taken of them are important,
as the colors speak in a different way when seen in real life. In a
real sense, the colors vary not only with what lights are shone on
them, but -- due to the physical attributes, including size, of the
paintstrokes, -- even varies from left eye view to right eye view,
as angles of perspective for each eye interact with the shapes of
the paint, which in turn constitute a whole with how light shines
just that moment. So, as every painter knows, there's a flavour both
of movement and of the three-dimensional to the substance of paint.
Add to all this the very well-known differences in colors between
computer monitors. As if that was not enough, the principle of making
up colors by adding R, G, and B (red, green, blue) which is the
convention (whether one agrees to this perhaps over-glossifying of
computers or not) in the conventional norm for computers, can dazzle
by million of colors and YET the range of actual colors in the real
world is far, far beyond this range.
So, we can only earnestly, even passionately, say: please visit the
art section of an Avenuege store and meet some of the paintings in real
life! These are made in acrylic -- or, acryllic as we like to spell it,
so as to accomodate prices which makes sense even as they are first-hand
original works and not merely prints of some kind; this leads up to such
prices also more young people can attain to, even for the best of the
productions. There's the notion of continual exhibition as to the newest
works, rolling them forth in founder's own setting without the additional
cost and influence of separate galleries and certain temporary exhibition
arrangements. With all respect for the many forms of art galleries
and art resellers -- with all their enormous importance -- artists
have, throughout all ages, as a complementing way of getting works to
the public, also provided own environments for doing so.
To make these paintings, acrylic is used, sometimes with
hand-mixed color ingredients. In making each painting,
usually, at some stage, also charcoal has been used in
the process, underneath the paint. In some cases, we have
let some of the charcoal elements be visible when it fits
the overall sense of the painting, but then only with
acrylic gloss robustly over these elements. In that way,
these elements seamlessly become part of the acrylic
painting.
THE ARCHIVE--how all this evolved! :)
===> Avenuege Art Catalogue for second half-year of 2014: here
===> Avenuege Art Catalogue for first half-year of 2015: here
===> Avenuege Art Catalogue for second half-year of 2015: here
===> Avenuege Art Catalogue for first half-year of 2016: here
===> Avenuege Art Catalogue for second half-year of 2016: here
===> Avenuege Art Catalogue for first exhibition year 2017: here
Footnote:
Clarification of the concepts muses, graces and more.
As many notable mythologists have pointed out, there are amazing
parallels between most of the world's greatest myths. For simplicity,
we will here consider something of the role of the ancient Greek
myths in shaping European culture.
In ancient Greece, as in any deep and rich culture, the myths existed
in many forms, sometimes contradicting each other. As the centuries
passed, various warlords gave more emphasis to some features of this
myth or these myths; and some magnificent poets, like Homer, gave a
certain interpration of many of them and sort of 'cleared up' the
field--but never in a way that put a final stop to the story-making.
As new cultures arose, including the Latin-Christian cultures,
they took on the old concepts and gave some of them new life entirely
while other concepts more or less dwindled in the process.
Thus, the notion of Gods and Goddesses became, in the flowing of
mythic inspirations from Greece to the rest of Europe by means also
of the Roman Empire and, gradually, also by means of Christianity,
replaced with a sense in which there is one God, named "Deus",
derived from "Zeus", and under him there are angels, also archangels
and so on; while some of the concepts relating to some goddesses or
muses or graces took on roles such as the Mother of God.
Yet, the word 'muses' had an independent development, and outlived
the ancient Greek myths completely--and can be, indeed, reapplied,
long after the culture of the ancient Hellene. If we permit ourselves
to be more monotheistic, then Zeus will be Deus, or God, and the
goddesses will be angels--but we can, to stick ot a Greek word, but
now used in a fresh manner--also say that the modern concept of
"muse" can apply to the rest of the Olympic pleroma, with some
understanding that genders are different for the higher beings when
it comes to male gods who were not Zeus.
In the early understanding, the concept of Graces and also Muses
referred to sources of inspiration of the making of art, love, and
beautiful works, and also commerce. Then there were 'higher'
Goddesses, such as Pallas Athena. In a more modern understanding,
it may be appropriate to call all of these lovely mythic beings
for muses, and when we say Three Graces, we can just as well say
Three Muses,--and allow there to be a different sort of hierarchy
of them. This, indeed, can be the exploration of each artist, of
each interested person. This footnote, then, points out that the
modern language use ought to be considered more relaxed than that
which scholastic mythologists point out. --S.R.W.